<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Geeky Weekly &#187; speech</title>
	<atom:link href="http://geekyweekly.com/tag/speech/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://geekyweekly.com</link>
	<description>My life as a computer / photo / sound / video game / music / movie / gun geek</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 10 Dec 2011 08:23:08 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Quotes from Obama talking to Democrats about stimulus package</title>
		<link>http://geekyweekly.com/2009/obama-talking-to-democrats-about-stimulus-package</link>
		<comments>http://geekyweekly.com/2009/obama-talking-to-democrats-about-stimulus-package#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 07 Feb 2009 02:00:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Andrew</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Political Stuff]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[economy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Obama]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[speech]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[spending]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[stimulus]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://geekyweekly.com/?p=819</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Obama rallies Democrats with tough partisan speech &#8220;We can&#8217;t embrace the losing formula that says only tax cuts will work for every problem we face; that ignores critical challenges like our addiction to foreign oil, or the soaring cost of &#8230; <a href="http://geekyweekly.com/2009/obama-talking-to-democrats-about-stimulus-package">Continue reading <span class="meta-nav">&#8594;</span></a>]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a rel="nofollow" href="http://geekyweekly.com/go.php?r=http://www.dcexaminer.com/politics/Obama-rallies-Democrats-with-tough-partisan-speech-Full-Text39195472.html" >Obama rallies Democrats with tough partisan speech</a></p>
<blockquote><p>&#8220;We can&#8217;t embrace the losing formula that says only tax cuts will work for every problem we face; that ignores critical challenges like our addiction to foreign oil, or the soaring cost of health care, or falling schools and crumbling bridges and roads and levees.&#8221;</p>
<p>&#8220;They didn&#8217;t vote for the status quo &#8212; they sent us here to bring change.&#8221;</p>
</blockquote>
<blockquote><p>&#8220;Then there&#8217;s the argument, well, this is full of pet projects.  When was the last time that we saw a bill of this magnitude move out with no earmarks in it?  Not one.  (Applause.)&#8221;</p>
<p>&#8220;Millions more Americans will lose their jobs.  Homes will be lost. Families will go without health care.  Our crippling dependence on foreign oil will continue.  That is the price of inaction.&#8221;</p>
<p>&#8220;I believe that legislation of this enormous magnitude, that by necessity we are moving quickly &#8212; we&#8217;re not moving quickly because we&#8217;re trying to jamb something down people&#8217;s throats.  We&#8217;re moving quickly because we&#8217;re told that if we don&#8217;t move quickly, that the economy is going keep on getting worse, and we&#8217;ll have another 2 or 3 or 4 million jobs loss this year.&#8221;</p>
<p>&#8220;Number two, it is expected that we are going to lose about a trillion dollars worth of demand this year, a trillion dollars of demand next year because of the contraction in the economy.  So the reason that this has to be big is to try to fill some of that lost demand.  And as it is, there are many who think that we should be doing even more.  (Applause.)  So we are taking prudent steps.&#8221;</p>
<p>&#8220;So then you get the argument, well, this is not a stimulus bill, this is a spending bill.  What do you think a stimulus is?  (Laughter and applause.) That&#8217;s the whole point.  No, seriously. (Laughter.)  That&#8217;s the point. (Applause.) &#8220;</p>
<p>&#8220;But let&#8217;s think big right now.  Let&#8217;s not think small.  Let&#8217;s not think narrowly.&#8221;</p>
<p>&#8220;This plan will save or create over three million jobs &#8212; almost all of them in the private sector.&#8221;</p>
</blockquote>
<p>No price tag is too big if we believe it will solve all of our problems.</p>

	Tagged with: <a href="http://geekyweekly.com/tag/economy" title="economy" rel="tag">economy</a>, <a href="http://geekyweekly.com/tag/obama" title="Obama" rel="tag">Obama</a>, <a href="http://geekyweekly.com/tag/speech" title="speech" rel="tag">speech</a>, <a href="http://geekyweekly.com/tag/spending" title="spending" rel="tag">spending</a>, <a href="http://geekyweekly.com/tag/stimulus" title="stimulus" rel="tag">stimulus</a><br />
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://geekyweekly.com/2009/obama-talking-to-democrats-about-stimulus-package/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>All I Want For Christmas Is a Candidate Like Reagan</title>
		<link>http://geekyweekly.com/2007/all-i-want-for-christmas-is-a-candidate-like-reagan</link>
		<comments>http://geekyweekly.com/2007/all-i-want-for-christmas-is-a-candidate-like-reagan#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 22 Dec 2007 16:34:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Andrew</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Political Stuff]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[election]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[history]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[reagan]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[speech]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://geekyweekly.com/2007/all-i-want-for-christmas-is-a-candidate-like-reagan</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I came across one of Reagan&#8217;s speeches, A Time for Choosing, a while back and his words are still important and relevant today. I think I&#8217;m going to compare all the 2008 Republican candidates to Reagan and see how well &#8230; <a href="http://geekyweekly.com/2007/all-i-want-for-christmas-is-a-candidate-like-reagan">Continue reading <span class="meta-nav">&#8594;</span></a>]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I came across one of Reagan&#8217;s speeches, <a rel="nofollow" href="http://geekyweekly.com/go.php?r=http://www.americanrhetoric.com/speeches/ronaldreaganatimeforchoosing.htm"  target="_blank">A Time for Choosing</a>, a while back and his words are still important and relevant today. I think I&#8217;m going to compare all the 2008 Republican candidates to Reagan and see how well they stand up. Anybody have fond memories of Reagan&#8217;s years in office (which I sadly missed) or think he&#8217;s the worst president ever (which is Carter actually) like my liberal American History professor in college?</p>
<p>Funny thing is my professor&#8217;s outright hatred of Reagan made me like Reagan even more. So much for indoctrination, but I know my classmates were eating it up like it was the Gospel which is sad.</p>

	Tagged with: <a href="http://geekyweekly.com/tag/election" title="election" rel="tag">election</a>, <a href="http://geekyweekly.com/tag/history" title="history" rel="tag">history</a>, <a href="http://geekyweekly.com/tag/reagan" title="reagan" rel="tag">reagan</a>, <a href="http://geekyweekly.com/tag/speech" title="speech" rel="tag">speech</a><br />
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://geekyweekly.com/2007/all-i-want-for-christmas-is-a-candidate-like-reagan/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Minified using disk: basic
Page Caching using disk: basic

Served from: geekyweekly.com @ 2012-02-08 19:50:44 -->
