<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Geeky Weekly &#187; hands free</title>
	<atom:link href="http://geekyweekly.com/tag/hands-free/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://geekyweekly.com</link>
	<description>My life as a computer / photo / sound / video game / music / movie / gun geek</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 06 Sep 2010 15:00:01 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Why hands-free cell phone laws are dumb</title>
		<link>http://geekyweekly.com/2008/why-hands-free-cell-phone-laws-are-dumb</link>
		<comments>http://geekyweekly.com/2008/why-hands-free-cell-phone-laws-are-dumb#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 22 Jun 2008 17:51:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Andrew</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Political Stuff]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[cell phone]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[driving]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[hands free]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[law]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[sarcasm]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://geekyweekly.com/?p=371</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Politicians must think that if they don't pass a new law every two days then they aren't doing their job. The hands-free cell phone law is a great example of this need to pass legislation that is supported by absolutely &#8230; <a href="http://geekyweekly.com/2008/why-hands-free-cell-phone-laws-are-dumb">Continue reading <span class="meta-nav">&#8594;</span></a>]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Politicians must think that if they don't pass a new law every two days then they aren't doing their job. The hands-free cell phone law is a great example of this need to pass legislation that is supported by absolutely zero reasonable thought.</p>
<p>At politician school you learn two things: find a legitimate problem and then create a dumb solution that doesn't address the actual problem. Firearm laws are a great example of this.</p>
<p>The new hands-free cell phone law is also a perfect example. There's two components to talking on a hand held cell phone: holding the phone to the side of your face and carrying out a conversation. The politician looks at this situation and sees two possibilities: make it illegal to hold a phone in your hand while driving or make it illegal to have conversations while driving. If I put my stupid politician hat on I immediately realize that holding a phone to your head drastically increases the risk of an accident and for the sake of public safety it must be stopped.</p>
<p>Removing the stupid politician hat I understand that my knee jerk reaction might not be valid and requires further investigation. Maybe scientists have done research into this problem area?</p>
<ul>
<li><a href="http://www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2003/01/030129080944.htm">Cell Phone Users Drive 'Blind'; Study Explains Why Hands-Free Phones Just As Bad As Hand-held</a></li>
<li><a href="http://www.sciencedaily.com/videos/2005/0806-cell_phone_risk.htm">Cognitive Psychologists Show Conversations Lower Visual Abilities</a></li>
<li><a href="http://www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2007/05/070522100807.htm">Passengers, Not Just Mobile Phones, Contribute To Road Accidents</a></li>
</ul>
<p>Hmmm how about that? It is quite possible that holding a <strong>conversation</strong> makes up most of the increase of collision risk.</p>
<p>When I look at the situation and use common sense I come to the conclusion that to have any noticeable effect on collisions all activities that distract a driver have to be made <strong>illegal</strong>, not just using a hand held cell phone. Here's a short list:</p>
<ul>
<li>Participating in any conversation</li>
<li>Listening to the radio/music/talk radio</li>
<li>Looking at billboards, bumper stickers, license plate frames or any other advertisements</li>
<li>Consuming food or beverages</li>
<li>Applying makeup</li>
<li>Driving with one hand (manual transmission drivers would have a 3 second period between shifts to place both hands back on the wheel)</li>
<li>Driving while holding any object</li>
<li>Sneezing/Coughing/Yawning/Sleeping/Farting/Barfing/Laughing/Stretching/Waving/Smiling/Thinking</li>
</ul>
<p>Okay I'm just kidding. Kind of. To spite the new law I might just drive around with a banana held up to my head blaring "Ring ring ring, banana phone" over my stereo. If it is illegal to talk on a phone in your hand surely I would get pulled over for doing the same with a piece of fresh fruit.</p>
	Tagged with: <a href="http://geekyweekly.com/tag/cell-phone" title="cell phone" rel="tag">cell phone</a>, <a href="http://geekyweekly.com/tag/driving" title="driving" rel="tag">driving</a>, <a href="http://geekyweekly.com/tag/hands-free" title="hands free" rel="tag">hands free</a>, <a href="http://geekyweekly.com/tag/law" title="law" rel="tag">law</a>, <a href="http://geekyweekly.com/tag/sarcasm" title="sarcasm" rel="tag">sarcasm</a><br />
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://geekyweekly.com/2008/why-hands-free-cell-phone-laws-are-dumb/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>6</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
