<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Geeky Weekly</title>
	<atom:link href="http://geekyweekly.com/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://geekyweekly.com</link>
	<description>My life as a computer/photo/sound/book/music/movie geek</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 16 Feb 2010 16:43:38 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
			<item>
		<title>Nikon D90 vs D5000 vs D3000: Which one is right for you?</title>
		<link>http://geekyweekly.com/2010/nikon-d90-vs-d5000-vs-d3000-which-one-is-right-for-you</link>
		<comments>http://geekyweekly.com/2010/nikon-d90-vs-d5000-vs-d3000-which-one-is-right-for-you#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 06 Feb 2010 07:23:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Andrew</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Photo Stuff]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[camera]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[D3000]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[D5000]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[D90]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[dslr]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[gear]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[lens]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[nikon]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://geekyweekly.com/?p=969</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[If you're reading this post then you're probably looking at one of Nikon's consumer DSLRs. I've been shooting with a D70 and now a D90 for 5 years and recently walked several co-workers through buying a DSLR. I thought I'd share how I laid things out for them. As of February 2010 Nikon has three [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>If you're reading this post then you're probably looking at one of Nikon's consumer DSLRs. I've been shooting with a D70 and now a D90 for 5 years and recently walked several co-workers through buying a DSLR. I thought I'd share how I laid things out for them. As of February 2010 Nikon has three offerings in the consumer DSLR market: the D3000, D5000 and D90. Nikon has placed each of the cameras about $200-300 apart from each other.</p>

<p><span style="text-decoration: underline;"><strong>D3000</strong></span></p>

<p><img class="alignleft" style="border: 0pt none;" src="http://ecx.images-amazon.com/images/I/517%2BbpHK4HL._SL160_.jpg" border="0" alt="" width="160" height="120" />When the D5000 came out Nikon needed something new to fill in the low end of their line up. The D3000 is pretty much the exact same camera as the D40x and D60 that previously held this spot. Aside from a .5" larger LCD screen, there's not going to be much difference between them. If you've never touched a DSLR before and your budget is tight, then this is a good place to start. It will be a good solid camera, but until Nikon refreshes it with a new model I don't think the D3000 offers the best bang for your buck.</p>

<p>Amazon has the <a href="http://www.amazon.com/gp/product/B002JCSV5I?ie=UTF8&amp;tag=geekweek-20&amp;linkCode=as2&amp;camp=1789&amp;creative=390957&amp;creativeASIN=B002JCSV5I">D3000 with 18-55mm VR kit lens</a><img class=" dmshtlqcpabwabrbhrfw dmshtlqcpabwabrbhrfw" style="border: none !important; margin: 0px !important;" src="http://www.assoc-amazon.com/e/ir?t=geekweek-20&amp;l=as2&amp;o=1&amp;a=B002JCSV5I" border="0" alt="" width="1" height="1" /> for about $465.</p>

<p><strong><span style="text-decoration: underline;">D5000</span></strong></p>

<p><img class="alignleft" style="border: 0pt none;" src="http://ecx.images-amazon.com/images/I/41cIkiUKeOL._SL160_.jpg" alt="Nikon D5000" width="160" height="120" />The D5000 is a big step up from the D3000 in terms of technology and functionality. The most visible difference is the tilt and swing LCD screen, but I don't think it's that big of a deal. Internally, the D5000 has a much newer CMOS sensor than the D3000. This is the same sensor in the D90 and it provides much better performance at higher ISO settings. It also inherited built in chromatic aberration correction from the D90 which removes fringing that can appear in brightly lit shots. You also get the ability to take video.</p>

<p>At this point, features are starting to trickle down from improvements being made on more expensive models. If you are more serious about photography, but still relatively new to the DSLR world then this is a good option. The added features are well worth the extra money.</p>

<p>Amazon has the <a href="http://www.amazon.com/gp/product/B00267S7TQ?ie=UTF8&amp;tag=geekweek-20&amp;linkCode=as2&amp;camp=1789&amp;creative=390957&amp;creativeASIN=B00267S7TQ"> D5000 with 18-55mm VR kit lens</a><img class=" dmshtlqcpabwabrbhrfw dmshtlqcpabwabrbhrfw" style="border: none !important; margin: 0px !important;" src="http://www.assoc-amazon.com/e/ir?t=geekweek-20&amp;l=as2&amp;o=1&amp;a=B00267S7TQ" border="0" alt="" width="1" height="1" /> for about $685.</p>

<p><span style="text-decoration: underline;"><strong>D90</strong></span></p>

<p><img class="alignleft" style="border: 0pt none;" src="http://ecx.images-amazon.com/images/I/51whvQ9lrsL._SL160_.jpg" alt="Nikon D90" width="160" height="120" />The D90 sits at the top of Nikon's consumer DSLR line up. From here there's a fairly big jump to the prosumer D300. There's two things that really set the D90 above the D5000: controls and lens compatibility.</p>

<p>Without getting into every little difference in controls I'll just highlight two. The first is the D90's front scroll wheel. The D5000 and D3000 both have one on the back for your thumb, but the second wheel on the D90 gives you quick access to changing other settings. In manual mode for example, one wheel controls the aperture and one controls the shutter. On the D5000 and D3000 you'd have to fiddle with menus to set one of them. In Program mode, which I shoot 95% of the time, the back wheel can tweak the shutter/aperture ratio, but I configured the front wheel to set exposure compensation which normally requires a simultaneous button press.</p>

<p>The next control difference is the inclusion of a customizable shortcut button on the front of the camera next to the lens mount. This can be hit with your index or middle finger to bring up a menu of shortcuts to the menu items you use most. I have a couple things like ISO and White Balance menus on there that I access frequently enough to not want to dig through the entire menu system. Both of these additional controls are big for me and I don't think I'd want to move to a camera without them.</p>

<p>The other thing to consider when comparing the D90 and it's D5000/D3000 counterparts is lens compatibility. The D90 includes a built in AF motor which means it is compatible with older AF lenses; the other two do not. On the D5000 and D3000, the only lenses that will autofocus are the ones with AF-S built in which isn't a big deal if you plan to stick with the 18-55mm or other newer lenses. If you wanted to shoot something like the older but excellent 50mm f/1.8 then the D90 is your best option.</p>

<p>If my discussion of the D90 went over your head then that's a good indication the D5000 is more than enough camera for you. The D90 provides good bang for your buck if you are going to get serious about photography. The kit includes an 18-105mm VR lens which will give you more reach than the 18-55mm. You also have the option of getting the D90 body by itself and then adding on whichever lens fits your needs the best.</p>

<p>Amazon has the <a href="http://www.amazon.com/gp/product/B001ENOZY4?ie=UTF8&amp;tag=geekweek-20&amp;linkCode=as2&amp;camp=1789&amp;creative=390957&amp;creativeASIN=B001ENOZY4">D90 with 18-105mm VR kit lens</a> for about $1035. The <a href="http://www.amazon.com/gp/product/B001ET5U92?ie=UTF8&amp;tag=geekweek-20&amp;linkCode=as2&amp;camp=1789&amp;creative=390957&amp;creativeASIN=B001ET5U92">D90 Body</a> is about $780 by itself.</p>

<p><span style="text-decoration: underline;"><strong>Conclusion</strong></span></p>

<p>A DSLR isn't cheap, but the extra money compared to a Point &amp; Shoot really opens up a new world of photography. If you have any questions about DSLRs feel free to leave a comment and pick my brain.</p>
	Tagged with: <a href="http://geekyweekly.com/tag/camera" title="camera" rel="tag">camera</a>, <a href="http://geekyweekly.com/tag/d3000" title="D3000" rel="tag">D3000</a>, <a href="http://geekyweekly.com/tag/d5000" title="D5000" rel="tag">D5000</a>, <a href="http://geekyweekly.com/tag/d90" title="D90" rel="tag">D90</a>, <a href="http://geekyweekly.com/tag/dslr" title="dslr" rel="tag">dslr</a>, <a href="http://geekyweekly.com/tag/gear" title="gear" rel="tag">gear</a>, <a href="http://geekyweekly.com/tag/lens" title="lens" rel="tag">lens</a>, <a href="http://geekyweekly.com/tag/nikon" title="nikon" rel="tag">nikon</a><br />
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://geekyweekly.com/2010/nikon-d90-vs-d5000-vs-d3000-which-one-is-right-for-you/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>&#8220;Hanging&#8221; out with Luke</title>
		<link>http://geekyweekly.com/2010/hanging-out-with-luke</link>
		<comments>http://geekyweekly.com/2010/hanging-out-with-luke#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 02 Feb 2010 22:42:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Andrew</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Life Stuff]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[android]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Luke]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[photography]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://geekyweekly.com/2010/hanging-out-with-luke</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[

Paul and Denise where hanging out with Luke after lunch Sunday. This is also an excuse to test the new Android Wordpress application.
	Tagged with: android, Luke, photography
]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><img style="display: block; margin-right: auto; margin-left: auto;" src="http://geekyweekly.com/wp-content/uploads/wpid-2010-01-31-13.35.09.jpg" alt="image" width="300" height="400" /></p>

<p>Paul and Denise where hanging out with Luke after lunch Sunday. This is also an excuse to test the new Android Wordpress application.</p>
	Tagged with: <a href="http://geekyweekly.com/tag/android" title="android" rel="tag">android</a>, <a href="http://geekyweekly.com/tag/luke" title="Luke" rel="tag">Luke</a>, <a href="http://geekyweekly.com/tag/photography" title="photography" rel="tag">photography</a><br />
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://geekyweekly.com/2010/hanging-out-with-luke/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>6</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Sigg Wide Mouth Water Bottle Review</title>
		<link>http://geekyweekly.com/2009/sigg-wide-mouth-water-bottle-review</link>
		<comments>http://geekyweekly.com/2009/sigg-wide-mouth-water-bottle-review#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 29 Nov 2009 19:47:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Andrew</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Life Stuff]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[gear]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[review]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://geekyweekly.com/?p=928</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[It took me a while to jump on the Sigg bandwagon, but I was pleasantly surprised to find that Sigg added wide mouth bottles to their product line up. I immediately liked these better than their older bottles for several reasons:



		Easier to fill wide mouth and option to use ice cubes
		Cap threads are made of [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It took me a while to jump on the Sigg bandwagon, but I was pleasantly surprised to find that Sigg added wide mouth bottles to their product line up. I immediately liked these better than their older bottles for several reasons:</p>


<ul>
		<li>Easier to fill wide mouth and option to use ice cubes</li>
		<li>Cap threads are made of plastic rather than metal, little nicer to drink from</li>
		<li>No coating on lip of spout, my brother has had this rub off over time on his newer bottles</li>
		<li>Better grip from the built in grooves on body of bottle</li>
		<li>Compatible with all Sigg caps</li>
</ul>


<p>I really like these bottles and take one to work with me everyday. I quit our "water cooler club" which was costing close to $6 a month just for water so it has more than paid for itself. Amazon has them at a very reasonable price with several colors to choose from.</p>

<p style="text-align: center;"><a href="http://www.amazon.com/gp/product/B001NPEMTG?ie=UTF8&#038;tag=geekweek-20&#038;linkCode=as2&#038;camp=1789&#038;creative=390957&#038;creativeASIN=B001NPEMTG"><img class="aligncenter" src="http://ecx.images-amazon.com/images/I/21nF5BjUodL._AA280_.jpg" alt="Sigg Wide Mouth Water Bottle" width="280" height="280" /></a></p>

<p style="text-align: center;"><a href="http://www.amazon.com/gp/product/B001NPEMTG?ie=UTF8&#038;tag=geekweek-20&#038;linkCode=as2&#038;camp=1789&#038;creative=390957&#038;creativeASIN=B001NPEMTG">Sigg Wide Mouth Bottle - 1L (34oz) at Amazon.com</a><img style="border:none !important; margin:0px !important;" src="http://www.assoc-amazon.com/e/ir?t=geekweek-20&amp;l=as2&amp;o=1&amp;a=B001NPEMTG" border="0" alt="" width="1" height="1" /></p>
	Tagged with: <a href="http://geekyweekly.com/tag/gear" title="gear" rel="tag">gear</a>, <a href="http://geekyweekly.com/tag/review" title="review" rel="tag">review</a><br />
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://geekyweekly.com/2009/sigg-wide-mouth-water-bottle-review/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>3</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>What the housing bubble looked like up close and personal</title>
		<link>http://geekyweekly.com/2009/what-the-housing-bubble-looked-like-up-close-and-personal</link>
		<comments>http://geekyweekly.com/2009/what-the-housing-bubble-looked-like-up-close-and-personal#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 06 Nov 2009 05:16:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Andrew</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Money Stuff]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[bubble]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[california]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[economy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Housing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[prices]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://geekyweekly.com/?p=921</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[

I thought it would be interesting to look at the sale prices of condos in the condo complex where we rent in Downey, CA. The graph speaks for itself. Prices in Southern California were completely out of touch with reality. Look at the bubble in the early 90's. Prices only went up by 50% and [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div id="attachment_923" class="wp-caption aligncenter" style="width: 585px"><a href="http://geekyweekly.com/wp-content/uploads/condoBubble1.png"><img class="size-thumbnail wp-image-923" title="condoBubble" src="http://geekyweekly.com/wp-content/uploads/condoBubble1-575x316.png" alt="Price trend of Quill Condos in Downey using data from Redfin" width="575" height="316" /></a><p class="wp-caption-text">Price trend of Quill Condos in Downey using data from Redfin</p></div>

<p>I thought it would be interesting to look at the sale prices of condos in the condo complex where we rent in Downey, CA. The graph speaks for itself. Prices in Southern California were completely out of touch with reality. Look at the bubble in the early 90's. Prices only went up by 50% and then declined for 6 straight years. In this last bubble, prices increased nearly 350% between 2000 and 2007. Much of those gains have been wiped out in 2 years since the bubble burst.</p>

<p>This graph is quite useful because it is comparing identical units (~300 sq. ft. max difference) in close proximity to each other. Expanding the comparison to Downey as a whole would introduce comparisons between dissimilar homes in substantially different neighborhoods. It doesn't make much sense mixing the large sprawling homes of Northeast Downey in with the tiny houses south of the 105.</p>

<p>Does anybody really believe prices will continue to trend upwards with high unemployment, shadow inventory twice the size of what is listed and the upcoming wave of Option ARM recasts? Good thing Congress extended the $8,000 credit, wouldn't want housing to be affordable.</p>
	Tagged with: <a href="http://geekyweekly.com/tag/bubble" title="bubble" rel="tag">bubble</a>, <a href="http://geekyweekly.com/tag/california" title="california" rel="tag">california</a>, <a href="http://geekyweekly.com/tag/economy" title="economy" rel="tag">economy</a>, <a href="http://geekyweekly.com/tag/housing" title="Housing" rel="tag">Housing</a>, <a href="http://geekyweekly.com/tag/prices" title="prices" rel="tag">prices</a><br />
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://geekyweekly.com/2009/what-the-housing-bubble-looked-like-up-close-and-personal/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Facebook Killed The Casual Blog</title>
		<link>http://geekyweekly.com/2009/facebook-killed-the-casual-blog</link>
		<comments>http://geekyweekly.com/2009/facebook-killed-the-casual-blog#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 25 Oct 2009 18:08:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Andrew</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Geek Stuff]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[blogging]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[facebook]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://geekyweekly.com/?p=910</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I stay pretty tuned in to the activity on our little blogosphere and for the past 6 months I've noticed a significant downward trend in the number of posts and comments coming through Google Reader. Is this slow down a direct result in everyone's increased use of Facebook?  My hypothesis is that people who were [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I stay pretty tuned in to the activity on our little blogosphere and for the past 6 months I've noticed a significant downward trend in the number of posts and comments coming through Google Reader. Is this slow down a direct result in everyone's increased use of Facebook?  My hypothesis is that people who were using blogs to casually post quick tidbits about life have migrated to Facebook and abandoned their individual blogs.</p>

<p>I think a big part of this migration is that the barrier to posting is very low on Facebook and the audience is quick to reach. I don't mind seeing what people did last night or checking out some of their photos, but I don't expect to have any deep discussions on Facebook. There's little incentive for people to post anything too meaningful because as soon it drops off the front page of everyone's News Feed it is essentially lost forever. Posts and comments on a blog are much more permanent and easily retrieved. I could easily find a blog post from last year, but I don't think I'd be able to find a Status Update from last year. Why invest time in creating content that might as well be deleted after it reaches an age of one week?</p>

<p>Of the 18 or so blogs on my Blogroll, I'd say only 5 or 6 could be considered active. All the people who's blogs are dead are active on Facebook. That seems like fairly good evidence that Facebook killed the casual blog. Not good or bad, it just is what it is.</p>
	Tagged with: <a href="http://geekyweekly.com/tag/blogging" title="blogging" rel="tag">blogging</a>, <a href="http://geekyweekly.com/tag/facebook" title="facebook" rel="tag">facebook</a><br />
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://geekyweekly.com/2009/facebook-killed-the-casual-blog/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>6</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Arnold has a knife, let&#8217;s see if he stabs us in the back</title>
		<link>http://geekyweekly.com/2009/arnold-has-a-knife-lets-see-if-he-stabs-us-in-the-back</link>
		<comments>http://geekyweekly.com/2009/arnold-has-a-knife-lets-see-if-he-stabs-us-in-the-back#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 09 Oct 2009 23:39:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Andrew</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Gun Stuff]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ammunition]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[california]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[firearms]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[guns]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[law]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[second amendment]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://geekyweekly.com/?p=908</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Right now Arnold has AB 962 sitting on his desk. He has until Sunday to veto AB 962 before it automatically becomes law. AB 962 does 3 things in the name of helping law enforcement efforts:



		Require dealers to obtain an ammunition seller's license and to collect a buyer's thumbprint, name, drivers license, address, phone number [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Right now Arnold has AB 962 sitting on his desk. He has until Sunday to veto AB 962 before it automatically becomes law. AB 962 does 3 things in the name of helping law enforcement efforts:</p>


<ol>
		<li>Require dealers to obtain an ammunition seller's license and to collect a buyer's thumbprint, name, drivers license, address, phone number and date of birth.</li>
		<li>Make handgun ammunition inaccessible to customers.</li>
		<li>Transfer of handgun ammunition must be done  face-to-face.</li>
</ol>


<p>Fine, #1 and #2 are just annoyances, but what about #3? Requiring handgun ammunition to be transferred in person effectively bans all mail order and Internet sales of handgun ammunition. Right now you can count the number of places where this is the law on one hand and the motivation put forward is to improve the enforcement of other laws and aiding investigations. As long as you can order ammunition through the mail, then criminals will be able to buy ammunition for the guns they aren't suppose to own. So if a criminal doesn't obey one law surely they'll obey this other law if we pass it. Right?</p>

<p>That's the ultimate problem with laws trying to control firearms and ammunition. The only ones who abide by the rules are those of us who are law abiding to begin with. Criminals can't own guns, but they still find ways to obtain them. Now criminals won't be able to buy ammo online, but does anyone believe they'll have trouble obtaining ammunition illegally for their illegally possessed weapons? The criminals go on breaking the law and the rest of us are saddled with more regulations, rules, hoops to jump through and higher prices. What would be next, a background check and 10 day waiting period for purchasing ammunition like we have with firearms?</p>

<p>Funny thing is there's nothing in the law about the <em>components</em> used to manufacture ammunition, those will still be available through mail order and the Internet. So even if this passes, criminals could order bullets, cases, powder, primers, dies and a nice progressive reloading press and assemble their own ammo. Actually that's what I'm thinking of doing. How backwards is this state that the laws they try to pass encourage individuals to think like criminals.</p>

<p>I'll be mashing my F5 button this weekend on this page: <a href="http://info.sen.ca.gov/cgi-bin/postquery?bill_number=ab_962&amp;sess=CUR&amp;house=B&amp;site=sen">AB 962 Status</a></p>
	Tagged with: <a href="http://geekyweekly.com/tag/ammunition" title="ammunition" rel="tag">ammunition</a>, <a href="http://geekyweekly.com/tag/california" title="california" rel="tag">california</a>, <a href="http://geekyweekly.com/tag/firearms" title="firearms" rel="tag">firearms</a>, <a href="http://geekyweekly.com/tag/guns" title="guns" rel="tag">guns</a>, <a href="http://geekyweekly.com/tag/law" title="law" rel="tag">law</a>, <a href="http://geekyweekly.com/tag/second-amendment" title="second amendment" rel="tag">second amendment</a><br />
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://geekyweekly.com/2009/arnold-has-a-knife-lets-see-if-he-stabs-us-in-the-back/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>3</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Koss PortaPro Headphone Review</title>
		<link>http://geekyweekly.com/2009/koss-portapro-headphone-review</link>
		<comments>http://geekyweekly.com/2009/koss-portapro-headphone-review#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 22 Aug 2009 02:00:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Andrew</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Geek Stuff]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[gear]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[headphones]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[music]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[review]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://geekyweekly.com/?p=296</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I reviewed the Sennheiser PX 100 headphones last year and really liked them. I had gotten the Koss PortaPro's about the same time, but hadn't really used them much. Listening to the PX100's at work for extended periods of time started making my ears hurt (maybe I have sensitive ears) and replacing the pads didn't [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I reviewed the <a href="http://geekyweekly.com/2008/sennheiser-px-100-headphones-review">Sennheiser PX 100 headphones</a> last year and really liked them. I had gotten the Koss PortaPro's about the same time, but hadn't really used them much. Listening to the PX100's at work for extended periods of time started making my ears hurt (maybe I have sensitive ears) and replacing the pads didn't improve things much, they're still clamping down on your ears to stay in place.</p>

<p>The Koss PortaPro's feature a "Comfort Zone" that places an additional pad above your ear where it can be set to transfer most of the "clamping" feeling from your ears up to the side of your head. This makes the PortaPro the most comfortable open, over the head headphones I've ever used. Ear discomfort is gone and I'm able to wear them for extended periods.</p>

<p>Along with being comfortable, they sound great. In fact I think I like how they sound better than the PX100's. The PortaPro's pump out some very nice low end while staying balanced and clear. The PX100's are a little more laid back and sound darker. The PortaPro's just have that extra bit of punch.</p>

<p>As of this writing the PortaPro's are $32 at Amazon while the PX100's are $50. Between the comfort, price and sound quality of the PortaPro's they are easily my favorite headphones now. They definitely get my sound geek stamp of approval.</p>

<p style="text-align: center;"><a href="http://www.amazon.com/gp/product/B00001P4ZH?ie=UTF8&amp;tag=geekweek-20&amp;linkCode=as2&amp;camp=1789&amp;creative=390957&amp;creativeASIN=B00001P4ZH">Koss PortaPro  Headphones at Amazon</a><img style="border:none !important; margin:0px !important;" src="http://www.assoc-amazon.com/e/ir?t=geekweek-20&amp;l=as2&amp;o=1&amp;a=B00001P4ZH" border="0" alt="" width="1" height="1" /></p>

<p><a href="http://www.amazon.com/gp/product/B00001P4ZH?ie=UTF8&amp;tag=geekweek-20&amp;linkCode=as2&amp;camp=1789&amp;creative=390957&amp;creativeASIN=B00001P4ZH"><img class="aligncenter size-full wp-image-906" title="Koss PortaPro" src="http://geekyweekly.com/wp-content/uploads/portapro.jpg" alt="Koss PortaPro" width="400" height="400" /></a></p>
	Tagged with: <a href="http://geekyweekly.com/tag/gear" title="gear" rel="tag">gear</a>, <a href="http://geekyweekly.com/tag/headphones" title="headphones" rel="tag">headphones</a>, <a href="http://geekyweekly.com/tag/music" title="music" rel="tag">music</a>, <a href="http://geekyweekly.com/tag/review" title="review" rel="tag">review</a><br />
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://geekyweekly.com/2009/koss-portapro-headphone-review/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Hey look it&#8217;s a box! &#8211; My CZ-75B SA First Impressions</title>
		<link>http://geekyweekly.com/2009/hey-look-its-a-box</link>
		<comments>http://geekyweekly.com/2009/hey-look-its-a-box#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 20 Aug 2009 07:27:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Andrew</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Gun Stuff]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[9mm]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[cz-75]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[targets]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://geekyweekly.com/?p=899</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Ooooh a small plastic box, wonder what's inside?



Oh hello CZ-75B SA 9mm.



Let's get you into something a little more comfortable.



But how does it shoot? Not bad for the first 10 rounds at 7 yards.



How about after 20 more rounds of practice?



I had been wanting a semi-auto in a caliber larger than .22 and I saw [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p style="text-align: center;">Ooooh a small plastic box, wonder what's inside?</p>

<p style="text-align: center;"><img class="size-full wp-image-902 aligncenter" title="a box" src="http://geekyweekly.com/wp-content/uploads/DSC_4225.JPG" alt="Hey I wonder what's in this" width="550" height="366" /></p>

<p style="text-align: center;">Oh hello CZ-75B SA 9mm.</p>

<p style="text-align: center;"><img class="size-full wp-image-901 aligncenter" title="DSC_4217" src="http://geekyweekly.com/wp-content/uploads/DSC_4217.JPG" alt="Oh hello CZ-75B SA 9mm" width="550" height="366" /></p>

<p style="text-align: center;">Let's get you into something a little more comfortable.</p>

<p style="text-align: center;"><img class="size-full wp-image-900 aligncenter" title="DSC_4254" src="http://geekyweekly.com/wp-content/uploads/DSC_4254.JPG" alt="Let's get you into something a little more comfortable" width="550" height="366" /></p>

<p style="text-align: center;">But how does it shoot? Not bad for the first 10 rounds at 7 yards.</p>

<p style="text-align: center;"><img class="size-full wp-image-904    aligncenter" title="DSC_4248" src="http://geekyweekly.com/wp-content/uploads/DSC_4248.JPG" alt=" " width="550" height="366" /></p>

<p style="text-align: center;">How about after 20 more rounds of practice?</p>

<p style="text-align: center;"><img class="aligncenter size-full wp-image-903" title="DSC_4247" src="http://geekyweekly.com/wp-content/uploads/DSC_4247.JPG" alt="DSC_4247" width="550" height="366" /></p>

<p style="text-align: left;">I had been wanting a semi-auto in a caliber larger than .22 and I saw this posted for sale on Calguns and it met my two requirements: all steel construction and very accurate right of the box. I have nothing against the 9mm round and it is relatively inexpensive compared to .45 ACP so that ends up being a plus too. The plastic grips were fine, but I thought the cocobolo grips added some nice style and contrast to the gun.</p>

<p style="text-align: left;">The "SA" in the model denotes that it is single action only. Because of that the trigger is pretty nice with a fairly light and short pull. I've read that the only gun with a nicer stock trigger is a 1911. Pointability is good and it fits great in my hand. The gun is unique in that the slide is on the inside of the frame which lowers the axis of the barrel closer to your hand and it minimizes the profile of the slide. The only downside is there's a little less slide to grab onto which makes racking the weapon tougher.</p>

<p style="text-align: left;">And I think the accuracy right of the box speaks for itself.</p>

<p><br class="spacer_" /></p>
	Tagged with: <a href="http://geekyweekly.com/tag/9mm" title="9mm" rel="tag">9mm</a>, <a href="http://geekyweekly.com/tag/cz-75" title="cz-75" rel="tag">cz-75</a>, <a href="http://geekyweekly.com/tag/targets" title="targets" rel="tag">targets</a><br />
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://geekyweekly.com/2009/hey-look-its-a-box/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>6</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>July needs a post</title>
		<link>http://geekyweekly.com/2009/july-needs-a-post</link>
		<comments>http://geekyweekly.com/2009/july-needs-a-post#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 30 Jul 2009 07:47:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Andrew</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Life Stuff]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[.38]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[firearms]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[revolver]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[work]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://geekyweekly.com/?p=896</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Holy cow July is almost over. We've been super busy at work since we deployed a fairly major application on July 1st. Friday is my birthday, 25, woohoo. I get to pick up my present next week, I'll keep that a secret for another post. And just in case you're wondering, I haven't lost my [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Holy cow July is almost over. We've been super busy at work since we deployed a fairly major application on July 1st. Friday is my birthday, 25, woohoo. I get to pick up my present next week, I'll keep that a secret for another post. And just in case you're wondering, I haven't lost my enthusiasm for firearms. This grouping from Sunday would be pretty darn nice if not for the one flyer:</p>

<p style="text-align: center;"><img class="aligncenter size-full wp-image-897" title="target" src="http://geekyweekly.com/wp-content/uploads/target.jpg" alt="target" />S&amp;W 686 4" revolver, .38 special, double action, 21 feet</p>
	Tagged with: <a href="http://geekyweekly.com/tag/38" title=".38" rel="tag">.38</a>, <a href="http://geekyweekly.com/tag/firearms" title="firearms" rel="tag">firearms</a>, <a href="http://geekyweekly.com/tag/revolver" title="revolver" rel="tag">revolver</a>, <a href="http://geekyweekly.com/tag/work" title="work" rel="tag">work</a><br />
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://geekyweekly.com/2009/july-needs-a-post/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Windows 7 Upgrade for cheap</title>
		<link>http://geekyweekly.com/2009/windows-7-upgrade-for-cheap</link>
		<comments>http://geekyweekly.com/2009/windows-7-upgrade-for-cheap#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 26 Jun 2009 16:35:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Andrew</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Geek Stuff]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[deal]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[software]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[windows 7]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://geekyweekly.com/?p=894</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[There's a preorder for Window 7 going on right now. $50 for Home Premium and it sounds like you can do a clean install to upgrade straight from XP to 7. I've been really impressed with it so far and I'm ready to upgrade all of my machines. The regular upgrade price is suppose to [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>There's a preorder for Window 7 going on right now. $50 for Home Premium and it sounds like you can do a clean install to upgrade straight from XP to 7. I've been really impressed with it so far and I'm ready to upgrade all of my machines. The regular upgrade price is suppose to be around $120. I put my copies on order at Amazon.</p>

<p><a href="http://www.amazon.com/gp/product/B002DHLUWK?ie=UTF8&amp;tag=geekweek-20&amp;linkCode=as2&amp;camp=1789&amp;creative=390957&amp;creativeASIN=B002DHLUWK">Microsoft Windows 7 Home Premium Upgrade</a><img style="border:none !important; margin:0px !important;" src="http://www.assoc-amazon.com/e/ir?t=geekweek-20&amp;l=as2&amp;o=1&amp;a=B002DHLUWK" border="0" alt="" width="1" height="1" /></p>
	Tagged with: <a href="http://geekyweekly.com/tag/deal" title="deal" rel="tag">deal</a>, <a href="http://geekyweekly.com/tag/software" title="software" rel="tag">software</a>, <a href="http://geekyweekly.com/tag/windows-7" title="windows 7" rel="tag">windows 7</a><br />
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://geekyweekly.com/2009/windows-7-upgrade-for-cheap/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>10</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
