<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: My Review of the Nikon 35mm f/1.8 AF-S DX</title>
	<atom:link href="http://geekyweekly.com/2009/my-review-of-the-nikon-35mm-f18/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://geekyweekly.com/2009/my-review-of-the-nikon-35mm-f18</link>
	<description>My life as a computer / photo / sound / video game / music / movie / gun geek</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 19 May 2012 02:55:39 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.4-beta4-20717</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Arnab</title>
		<link>http://geekyweekly.com/2009/my-review-of-the-nikon-35mm-f18#comment-19431</link>
		<dc:creator>Arnab</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 08 Jan 2010 06:11:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://geekyweekly.com/?p=874#comment-19431</guid>
		<description>I just bought a 52 mm prime for my d5000. I was wondering if the 35mm would have been a better option :? or should I own both? I noticed 52mm gives better depth but 35mm is good for close ups.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I just bought a 52 mm prime for my d5000. I was wondering if the 35mm would have been a better option :? or should I own both? I noticed 52mm gives better depth but 35mm is good for close ups.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Andrew</title>
		<link>http://geekyweekly.com/2009/my-review-of-the-nikon-35mm-f18#comment-17959</link>
		<dc:creator>Andrew</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 05 Jul 2009 18:13:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://geekyweekly.com/?p=874#comment-17959</guid>
		<description>Charles,

I shot with my 35mm last night to see if I noticed anything out of the ordinary. The focusing on mine does have an audible &quot;whirring&quot;, but definetely not &quot;clicking&quot;. It might appear to sound clicky if you&#039;ve got AF-C on and it is hunting for a lock. I&#039;ve got the 18-200mm VR and had the 18-70mm before it and I haven&#039;t heard much difference between them.

Compared to the 50mm they are much quieter. I always hated when the 50mm slams into infinity with a loud clunk as it hunts for focus.

So yeah it isn&#039;t silent, but from a couple feet away nobody else would even hear it.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Charles,</p>
<p>I shot with my 35mm last night to see if I noticed anything out of the ordinary. The focusing on mine does have an audible &#8220;whirring&#8221;, but definetely not &#8220;clicking&#8221;. It might appear to sound clicky if you&#8217;ve got AF-C on and it is hunting for a lock. I&#8217;ve got the 18-200mm VR and had the 18-70mm before it and I haven&#8217;t heard much difference between them.</p>
<p>Compared to the 50mm they are much quieter. I always hated when the 50mm slams into infinity with a loud clunk as it hunts for focus.</p>
<p>So yeah it isn&#8217;t silent, but from a couple feet away nobody else would even hear it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Charles S</title>
		<link>http://geekyweekly.com/2009/my-review-of-the-nikon-35mm-f18#comment-17956</link>
		<dc:creator>Charles S</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 04 Jul 2009 16:37:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://geekyweekly.com/?p=874#comment-17956</guid>
		<description>I just got the lens, and it&#039;s my first Nikon lens with SWM on it.  What&#039;s bothering me is the &quot;scratchy&quot; &quot;clicky&quot; noise during focusing.  

I&#039;ve found one site that mentioned the same thing, and a short discussion on flickr about whether it&#039;s scratchy or completely silent.  I also own the 50mm f/1.8 and I know this far more quiet compare to that lens, but I&#039;d not call is silent.  I wonder if you can share with us your impression of the noise you hear.  Thanks.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I just got the lens, and it&#8217;s my first Nikon lens with SWM on it.  What&#8217;s bothering me is the &#8220;scratchy&#8221; &#8220;clicky&#8221; noise during focusing.  </p>
<p>I&#8217;ve found one site that mentioned the same thing, and a short discussion on flickr about whether it&#8217;s scratchy or completely silent.  I also own the 50mm f/1.8 and I know this far more quiet compare to that lens, but I&#8217;d not call is silent.  I wonder if you can share with us your impression of the noise you hear.  Thanks.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: kui</title>
		<link>http://geekyweekly.com/2009/my-review-of-the-nikon-35mm-f18#comment-17744</link>
		<dc:creator>kui</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 01 May 2009 00:33:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://geekyweekly.com/?p=874#comment-17744</guid>
		<description>i&#039;m looking forward to buy this 35mm too...woohohoho... do u think that it will be much different if i&#039;m using d40 with 35mm compare to d90 like yours?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>i&#8217;m looking forward to buy this 35mm too&#8230;woohohoho&#8230; do u think that it will be much different if i&#8217;m using d40 with 35mm compare to d90 like yours?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: nathan118</title>
		<link>http://geekyweekly.com/2009/my-review-of-the-nikon-35mm-f18#comment-17663</link>
		<dc:creator>nathan118</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 09 Apr 2009 02:07:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://geekyweekly.com/?p=874#comment-17663</guid>
		<description>Looks nice...and takes nice pictures!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Looks nice&#8230;and takes nice pictures!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Minified using disk: basic
Page Caching using disk: basic

Served from: geekyweekly.com @ 2012-05-21 05:35:01 -->
