<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Star Wars: Tie Fighter review</title>
	<atom:link href="http://geekyweekly.com/2008/star-wars-tie-fighter-review/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://geekyweekly.com/2008/star-wars-tie-fighter-review</link>
	<description>My life as a computer / photo / sound / video game / music / movie / gun geek</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 10 Feb 2012 06:00:26 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: nathan118</title>
		<link>http://geekyweekly.com/2008/star-wars-tie-fighter-review#comment-17138</link>
		<dc:creator>nathan118</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 17 Dec 2008 05:25:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://geekyweekly.com/?p=727#comment-17138</guid>
		<description>It was all about the FX chip!

Oh wait, no it wasn&#039;t...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It was all about the FX chip!</p>
<p>Oh wait, no it wasn&#8217;t&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Denise</title>
		<link>http://geekyweekly.com/2008/star-wars-tie-fighter-review#comment-17137</link>
		<dc:creator>Denise</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 17 Dec 2008 03:56:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://geekyweekly.com/?p=727#comment-17137</guid>
		<description>Oh! What&#039;s that--what could it be? That, my friend is the sound of Falco Lombardi, Peppy Hare, and Slippy Toad blasting your Arwing to pieces from behind. You are dead. I will bury you in the 90&#039;s.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Oh! What&#8217;s that&#8211;what could it be? That, my friend is the sound of Falco Lombardi, Peppy Hare, and Slippy Toad blasting your Arwing to pieces from behind. You are dead. I will bury you in the 90&#8242;s.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Andrew</title>
		<link>http://geekyweekly.com/2008/star-wars-tie-fighter-review#comment-17135</link>
		<dc:creator>Andrew</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 16 Dec 2008 23:24:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://geekyweekly.com/?p=727#comment-17135</guid>
		<description>Star Fox was good for a console game, but it would definitely not rate above Tie Fighter. It was a tough game since you had to play through the whole thing in one go which made you learn and perfect each stage. That sort of game design has fallen off as games got more complicated and immersive.

You do receive 5 Schrute bucks for pulling out an early 90&#039;s video game reference.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Star Fox was good for a console game, but it would definitely not rate above Tie Fighter. It was a tough game since you had to play through the whole thing in one go which made you learn and perfect each stage. That sort of game design has fallen off as games got more complicated and immersive.</p>
<p>You do receive 5 Schrute bucks for pulling out an early 90&#8242;s video game reference.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Denise</title>
		<link>http://geekyweekly.com/2008/star-wars-tie-fighter-review#comment-17134</link>
		<dc:creator>Denise</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 16 Dec 2008 22:48:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://geekyweekly.com/?p=727#comment-17134</guid>
		<description>Starfox = 9.6</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Starfox = 9.6</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Minified using disk: basic
Page Caching using disk: basic

Served from: geekyweekly.com @ 2012-02-10 02:43:55 -->
