Comments on: Democrats acknowledge Global Cooling during tonight’s debate

By: Kathy

Kathy — Sun, 11 May 2008 13:42:08 +0000

After reading about the global cooling debate on quite a few sites, I can’t help but notice that alot of global warming advocates actually seem to want the planet to end in fire. Are they actually that bent on being correct? If so, they are truly nuts. This whole issue is way too imortant with way too much at stake for it to be a political one.

By: nathan118

nathan118 — Tue, 04 Mar 2008 02:00:11 +0000

“the scientific research in favor of the Global Warming Hypothesis is funded by parties with a vested interest in the truth.”

HAHA! While you might like to think these people are without self-interest, you are wrong. Every grant dollar they get to fund the research would be gone if the study of global warming went away. It’s not in their interest to come out and say “we’re wrong, this is all hogwash., lease stop sending us money.”

By: Andrew

Andrew — Mon, 03 Mar 2008 22:37:57 +0000

So all the scientists that have spoken out against global warming are automatically treated as puppets for the oil companies? Good try at using guilt by association; I take it you have a source that documents how all scientists opposed to global warming are receiving funding from big oil?

If I am so uninformed, what scientific literature should I be reading? Which parties exactly have a vested interest in the truth?

And I guess all these scientists are just full of it?

Should I believe something like this article written by a professor of natural resources with a Ph.D. in ecological climatology and past president of the American Association of State Climatologists?

By: David Tames

David Tames — Mon, 03 Mar 2008 21:55:55 +0000

I would read more of the scientific literature before making any broad statements about the validity or invalidity of the Global Warming Hypothesis. It’s a Hypothesis with lots of evidence, and we certainly have many things to gain by putting less hydrocarbons into the air. The propaganda against the Global Warming Hypothesis is funded by parties with a vested interest in oil consumption, the scientific research in favor of the Global Warming Hypothesis is funded by parties with a vested interest in the truth. Hmmm. Always look at the science and the sources of funding to better understand bias and point of view.

By: nathan118

nathan118 — Sat, 01 Mar 2008 01:21:51 +0000

I think we would all agree then that resources poured into reducing carbon emmissions would be a poor stewardship of our resources.

By: Jason the Parks

Jason the Parks — Thu, 28 Feb 2008 18:06:30 +0000

We still have to be responsible (i.e. Stewardship) with what we have been given, whether the Earth is Hot or Cold.

By: Andrew

Andrew — Thu, 28 Feb 2008 06:06:07 +0000

Nope, I have no idea who Rick Butts is. Not sure how he came across my site either. Might have been through my WordPress plugins.

By: Judy

Judy — Thu, 28 Feb 2008 04:34:23 +0000

Geeky Weekly (I’ve learned my lesson from Clark Kent), do you know Rick Butts Show?????

By: Rick Butts Show

Rick Butts Show — Wed, 27 Feb 2008 21:24:12 +0000

Absolutely – postitively – RIGHT ON!

The whole GW alarm people will be viewed as a bunch of total crackpots 50 years from now.

They will have the dreadful reputations of the “Flat Earth Society” for being totally wrong.

By: Denise

Denise — Wed, 27 Feb 2008 04:42:09 +0000

Wrong. I change earth’s climate with my mind.